Introduction
When ATI brought their Xpress 200 Crossfire (RD480) chipset to the motherboard market, they were a bit late to the game. As you may know, the Xpress 200 chipset itself has been around since the end of 2004, but the Crossfire version didn't come until just a few months ago, at the end of November, 2005. When we finally saw the Crossfire parts become available for purchase, it was clear that ATI had some serious catching up to do. With so many people already swearing by NVIDIA's competing solutions, ATI really needed to pull out all the stops. While Crossfire proved to be competitive with SLI, it certainly didn't blow it out of the water.On the NVIDIA side of things, we've seen some manufacturers transitioning to dual x16 PCIe parts. Previously, you would get x16 with a single card, but two x8 when running SLI. The move to dual x16, however, did not result in any clear performance benefits. So, at the end of the day, dual x16 has become nothing more than a marketing tool for NVIDIA to claim dominance over the competition. Until today, that is.One week ago (Feb 22, 2006), I was in San Francisco along with fellow members of the press for ATI's RD580 Technology Day. The day was spent listening to a handful of people from ATI tell us all about RD580, what went into the design, what makes it better than the competition, and so on. Today we will be talking about ATI's Crossfire Xpress 3200 (RD580) chipset. In the most basic terms, it's a dual x16 solution - but it's much more than RD480 with dual x16 PCIe. RD580 was designed from the ground up and promises to bring real performance benefits through the use of "true"? dual x16 PCIe slots. ATI is also boasting superior overclockability, in terms of both headroom and tweakability. As of today, March 1, at 8am CST, you should be able to purchase motherboards using ATI's new chipset. The first board partner to have product available will be ASUS with their A8R32-MVP Deluxe, to be followed by products from Sapphire, DFI, ABIT, and PCPartner in the weeks to come.Unfortunately, due to a mix-up in shipping, we don't have an A8R32-MVP Deluxe on-site for performance testing at this time. That said, we wouldn't have had the time necessary to really put the motherboard to test anyways, so rather than giving hard performance testing results, we will be discussing the technology behind ATI's Crossfire Xpress 3200 and what we expect to find when we do get to test the performance. In the near future you can look forward to some head-to-head performance comparisons between leading dual x16 solutions as we investigate ATI's claims, but for now let's talk about the technology behind the product.
Inside RD580
"True" Dual x16 PCIe
Crossfire Xpress 3200 is known by many enthusiasts as RD580, but the engineers who poured their heart and soul into it endearingly named it Skeletor because, as Joe Macri said, "who's bigger and badder than Skeletor?"? As I mentioned before, RD580 was designed from scratch, and it was about 8 months before it went into production. Just 24 hours after receiving the first silicon, ATI was able to get Crossfire up and running stable. After the now infamous bug with R580, it would look as though ATI's luck is about to change.The chip is manufactured on TSMC's 0.11um process, and it sports the smallest northbridge die on the market at only 39mm2, containing 22 million transistors and with a Total Designed Power (TDP) of 8W. The chip will be passively cooled by a fanless heatsink, which means less noise and more stability, as it is common for heatsink fans to die.As you will see, ATI has made great claims about real performance benefits which can be seen thanks to their "true dual x16 PCIe."? Before I go into detail about ATI's solution, let's examine NVIDIA's method of passing data from card-to-card in an AMD-based nForce4 dual x16 SLI setup. For this example, we'll use ASUS' A8N32-SLI motherboard, which uses a C51 Northbridge chip for the North Bridge and an nForce4 SLI chip for the South Bridge. Each of these two chips drives a single x16 slot. What's interesting, however, is the fact that there is a bandwidth bottleneck between these two chips, where the data is NOT carried on the PCIe bus. Although both cards communicate with a chip via the x16 PCIe bus, the communication between the two chips, which is vital for SLI, negates the benefit of having dual x16 in the first place, or so says ATI at least.
ATI's Crossfire Xpress 3200 chipset communicates with both video cards, each across x16 PCIe, on what ATI has labeled the "Xpress Route."? The main difference is that communication is more efficient and each card will be communicating with the other through one central chip - no bottlenecks. ATI claims up to 50% performance gains with mid-range GPUs and up to 100% performance gains with low-end GPUs, in comparison with NVIDIA's solution. This is what got me to thinking and set off some bells in my head.
Sure, the NVIDIA dual x16 solution suffers from a bottleneck, but that is assuming that the cards are communicating directly between the two chips. With a high-end SLI setup NVIDIA says that you must use the SLI bridge for optimal performance, this is precisely because of the bottleneck pointed out by ATI. With the SLI bridge connection, you eradicate the bottleneck, and therefore you do get dual x16 PCIe. Of course, if you are using some mid-range or low-end parts which don't require a bridge connection, then you will suffer from the bottleneck ATI has pointed out. I don't really doubt ATI's claims of boosted performance in these areas, but I do not think there will be any difference in speed attributable to ATI's "true"? dual x16 implementation in the high-end segment.
Overclocking
One of the things ATI really tried to get across to us is that RD580 is a superb overclocker. All the logic is massively overspecced, so you should be able to achieve incredible overclocking results on stock cooling and without upping voltage. More specifically, the HT link interface has been optimized so that it can run at over 1.5GHz (50%+ overclock) and the PCIe interface can run up to 3.5GHz (40% overclock). Another plus is that there is no internal division when raising the HTT reference clock, translating to a 1:1 internal clock increase.
South Bridge
The information I was given about RD580 shows that motherboard manufacturers can choose to use either the ULi 1575 or ATI SB450 South Bridge. I'm not positive on this, but based on the fact that the ASUS A8R32-MVP specifications say nothing about SATA II, I believe it will use ATI's SB450 South Bridge. The SB450 has received harsh criticism for not only a lack of SATA II (and NCQ) support, but also for poor USB performance. I don't know at this time what the other manufacturers will decide to use for the South Bridge on their boards.
Closing ThoughtsWithout actually having a board on-hand for testing, it's impossible to absolutely distinguish between what is reality and what is just marketing. And even if we had received a motherboard last week, we wouldn't have had enough time to properly test it against competing boards to come to any conclusive statements. However, based on our analysis of the technology, it does seem that ATI's claims regarding performance could hold true, to some degree, in the mid-range and low-end segments (without a connector).For me, the big question remains exactly how much of a difference is there? And is there any difference between the solutions in these segments when there IS a connector between the two cards? What about for the high-end? I can understand ATI wanting to use a weakness of NVIDIA's solution to their advantage, after all, NVIDIA takes every opportunity that presents itself to step on ATI - I just wonder how much this weakness really matters in the grand scheme of things. How many people are actually trying to run mid-range cards in SLI without a connector? And why would they do that, when better performance is just an SLI bridge away? In the low-end sector, I am curious as to how many people actually purchase two low-end cards. I would imagine most people who are interested in SLI and drop over $100 on an nForce4 SLI motherboard, would also want to buy a decent video card.EDIT: When this article was posted, I was unsure what South Bridge the ASUS A8R32-MVP used. Based on the specifications I was given of the board (which did not say anything about SATA II support) I could only guess that it used the SB450. It has come to my attention, however, that the ASUS board actually employs the ULi M1575 South Bridge, which does include support for SATA II and NCQ and doesn't suffer from the poor USB performance of the SB450. I still don't know for sure what South Bridge the other motherboard manufacturers will be implementing (though it seems most are leaning towards the ULi), so we'll see how that goes.Overclocking is always a great thing for the enthusiast market, and we look forward to pushing this board to its limits and comparing our overclocking results with that of the competition. In the weeks to come, we'll be getting our hands on some dual X16 boards and put them through their paces. We will test and compare dual x8 and dual x16 solutions from both NVIDIA and ATI and find out what performance benefits we can realistically expect from either solution.